Opinion Page

Much ado about nothing. That's what those Democrats are squealing about these days. They're trying to "cripple" the Bush Administration by creating fake "scandals," in an effort to 1) hurt Bush's reelection campaign, 2) damage the Republican party which supports him, and 3) diminish the Clinton-era scandals by showing that "every" President has them. Unfortunately for the Democrats, Bush isn't the philandering rapist that Bill was. And he isn't pilfering china sets and furniture. He's also not destroying evidence, equipment, or the moral fiber of the Country. And that makes them mad. So, in an effort to take Bush down, they're manufacturing scandal where none exists. They know that if they can get their willing accomplices, the left-controlled media, to assist, they can make it look like Bush is "dirty", and taint those associated with him and those who support him. To borrow a phrase from those who created it, it's the "politics of personal destruction."

Why now? Well, with Wesley Clark opening his pie-hole, everything he says either contradicts his own (prior) words, or else tries to contradict established physics. Since I believe that Albert Einstein is smarter than Wesley Clark, by orders of magnitude, I think that Wesley Clark is nothing more than a pawn in a plot by a "left-wing conspiracy" to overtake the White House. Hey, if the Clintons can coin the term, I can paraphrase it. Hillary Clinton is somewhere, laying in wait, like a panther near a herd at night. In case you don't know where you fit in all of this, to the Clintons you are just fodder for their political ambitions. You are an antelope unaware of her dark plans. She knows that Bush can't run again in 2008, so her goal is to weaken anyone's chances in 2004, to make sure that she can run in 2008. Unless, that is, she senses a weakness, in which case she will jump in 2004 and replace Clark.

"Anarchists." That's how the Democrats describe the Libertarians. And to me, that's a compliment. Since the Democratic plan is for a Socialist control of government detailing control of your actions from the cradle to the grave and obviating you from any personal responsibility, I think that anyone who is opposed to their "plan" would be flattered to be called an anarchist. So, if you want to be an anarchist and live in a place where Socialist ideals are not placed above your own ideas, move to New Hampshire. In case you haven't heard, New Hampshire was selected for the Libertarian takeover. Unlike the failed experiment that is California, NH will see a reduced government, and with it, reduced government costs. The result will be reduced taxes, and an increase in businesses in the state. You heard it here first.

See what else I have to say Previous day's rant

Go to Top

If you have ideas, comments, or criticisms, .

Home